Hitler's Horoscope, cast by Maximilian Bauer
from Hanussen's Berliner Wochenschau #11, March 25, 1932.
("Hanussen's Berlin Weekly Outlook", an occult magazine)
See: Erik Jan Hanussen; Hitler's Jewish Clairvoyant, Mel Gordon,
And Heinrich Himmler was a real nut about "spiritual" matters.
Peter Padfield notes that from late 1923 to early 1924,
Heinrich Himmler's reading included books on spiritualism, second sight,
astrology, telepathy, and the like.
Heinrich Himmler fancied himself the reincarnation of
an ancient Bavarian king, King Heinrich, returned to life to
fulfill a grand destiny.
Fascinated by tales of King Arthur and his knights, Himmler's "Camelot"
for his own knightly Order was the castle of Wewelsberg near
Paderborn in Westphalia. Having acquired it in 1934, Himmler had massive
reconstruction work done (paid for by his company "The
Society for the Protection and Maintenance of German Cultural Monuments")
— the labour came, of course, from the concentration camps.
The focal point of the castle was a huge round oak table with seating
for twelve of his senior Gruppenführers:
"They sat in high-backed chairs made out of pigskin, on each of which
was a silver disk on which the selected 'knight' had his name
engraved. Here the chiefs of the SS were compelled to sit in the company
of their Grand Master [Himmler] for hours of contemplation and meditation ...
Each 'knight' had his own quarters in the castle..."[Graber]
Beneath this room was a crypt containing pedestals where should one of
the "knights" die an urn containing his ashes [Graber] or his coat
of arms [Padfield] would be burnt. Vents in the ceiling would allow those
in the main hall to see the smoke rise or "the spirit ascend into a
type of Valhalla". [Graber]
Himmler's own private rooms in the castle were dedicated to the tenth-century
Saxon King Heinrich the first (also known as Henry the
Fowler) decked out in period fashion. According to Himmler's masseur,
Himmler believed he was the reincarnation of the king, although
Padfield notes that this sits uneasily with Himmler's ideas of life after
death (by physical transmission of blood in the clan). Himmler shared
his Christian name with the king, and may have felt he was an honorary
member of a royal clan. His father had been tutor to Prince
Heinrich of Bavaria, and the young Himmler was not only named for him
but was the Prince's godson.[Padfield] Whatever the case, at
midnight each July 2nd (the anniversary of the Saxon king's death) he
would apparently commune in silence with King Heinrich. [Graber]
Graber, G.S., History of the SS, Robert Hale, 1978
Padfield, Peter, Himmler: Reichsführer SS, Macmillan, 1990
THE NAZI NECROMANCER? The Magical World of Heinrich Himmler,
by Liam Rogers
Heinrich Himmler told his SS:
"Never forget we are a knightly order, from which we cannot withdraw, to which we
are recruited by blood."
An unrepentant widow of a senior SS officer, Frau Florentine Rost von Tonnigen, declared,
"Himmler was a man of vision and out of this vision came the Wewelsburg.
The SS is the true absolute elite of all that has been. The world today considers
us criminals, but there is no purer, more intense, and intellectually higher body
than the SS. Thank God there are still a few German people who know something
of the Wewelsburg."
The BBC TV program Hitler's Search for the Holy Grail
Also see the news
that Heinrich Himmler was a convert to Buchmanism:
He had just married Marge Conzersowo, a nurse in a fashionable Berlin clinic who had seen
through the science of medicine as practiced by the orthodox faculty.9
She interested Himmler in mesmerism, homœopathy, and herbal remedies. Himmler
with his agricultural diploma particulary liked herbs.
9. Evidence of Karl Gebhardt, in Bayle, Croix gammée ou caducée, p. 222.
It was widely reported towards the year 1935 that she had converted Himmler to the
— "the SS, alibi of a nation, 1922-1945", by Gerald Reitlinger (1957, Viking Press).
Croix gammée ou caducée [the Swastika or the caduceus]
is the transcripts of the Nuremberg Nazi war crimes trials of
doctors who committed war crimes against Jewish prisoners, such as the infamous
medical experiments done on Jewish prisoners. Karl Gebhardt was one of the defendants, and he
spoke about Heinrich Himmler's fascination with the occult and his participation in Buchmanism.
He said that Heinrich Himmler was a convert to Frank Buchman's "Oxford Group".
The full name of the book is: Croix gammée contre caducée
— Les Experiences Humaines En Allemagne Pendant La Deuxieme Guerre
Mondiale, by Francois Bayle. That is,
"The Swastika versus the Caduceus — The Human Experiments In
Germany During The Second World War".
Published by Centre De L'Imprimerie Nationale a Neustadt (Palatinat), 1950.
8 volumes, 1521 pages.
A caduceus is that symbol that we identify with doctors and medical
treatment, the two snakes entwining around a winged staff. Like this:
"Towards the year 1935" is better translated as
"From 1935 on", which means that the three Alcoholics Anonymous
co-founders William Griffith Wilson, Dr. Robert Holbrook Smith, and Clarence Snyder,
were all members of Dr. Frank Nathan Daniel Buchman's "Oxford Group"
cult religion at the same time as Heinrich Himmler,
the German Nazi leader of the Gestapo and the SS and author of the Holocaust.
And Bill and Bob and Clarence Snyder never objected to the Nazi connection;
they just kept right on recruiting for the Oxford Group
while Dr. Frank Buchman praised the Nazis and hobnobbed with Heinrich Himmler at
Nuremberg Nazi Party rallies.
I know that the official A.A. organization does not recognize Clarence Snyder as a co-founder
of A.A. In fact, they purged his story "The Home Brewmeister"
from the 4th edition of the Big Book
because he dared to criticize Bill Wilson's financial dishonesty
and constant mooching and stealing of A.A. funds.
The A.A. headquarters is making Clarence Snyder into a Stalinesque "unperson", somebody
who never existed.
But Clarence Snyder created the "Alcoholics Anonymous" name for the organization
when he and his group of alcoholics
broke away from the Oxford Group cult in Akron in May of 1939,
and Clarence Snyder held the first Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, ever.
They were in Cleveland, Ohio, not in Akron or New York like Bill Wilson said.
Bill Wilson was holding nameless Oxford Group meetings in New York at that time, after he had been
kicked out of the Oxford Group for failing to follow orders.
The meetings featured the same cult religion practices and beliefs as Buchman's Oxford Group,
just minus the name "Oxford Group", and minus the leader Dr. Frank Buchman.
But it was still the same religion.
In late 1939, Bill Wilson began writing the opening chapters of a book, tentatively titled
"One Hundred Men: The story of how 100 men recovered from alcoholism",
which was to be owned by "The One Hundred Men Corporation".
In April 1940, Bill Wilson took the name "Alcoholics Anonymous" for the Big Book and his
organization, and said that
"Alcoholics Anonymous" was "favored by the Akron crowd".
He gave no credit to Clarence Snyder or the Cleveland group because Snyder had
strongly criticized Bill for being
unemployed and mooching off of his wife Lois and the A.A. organization for nine years.
Also, Bill Wilson was jealous of Clarence Snyder because Snyder was much better
at recruiting than Bill was. The Cleveland group was growing at twice the
rate of Bill's New York group, and Bill wistfully dreamed of getting Snyder's recruiting rate,
and having a group the size of Clarence Snyder's.
In fact, Bill Wilson had good reasons to fear that Clarence Snyder could eventually take over the
A.A. organization, and that would be a financial disaster for Bill Wilson, because
Clarence Snyder would not allow Bill to
keep his hand in the A.A. cookie jar
So Bill did everything he could to minimize Clarence Snyder's role in A.A., and Snyder's
contributions to A.A. So Clarence Snyder didn't get any official recognition for
creating the Alcoholics Anonymous name.
And now Clarence Snyder has even been purged from the A.A. Big Book, and
effectively erased from A.A. history. Shades of Stalin's rewriting history.
Heinrich Himmler had agents running all over Europe, looking for the Holy Grail.
The adventure movies Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark and its
sequel Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade were
actually based on a tiny kernel of truth.
The Nazis really did want all of the old holy relics that they
could get their hands on.
Himmler established an office called the Ahnenerbe, whose job it was
to seek out antiquities and ancient relics, and they went on digs just as portrayed
in Raiders of the Lost Ark.
Lanzinger: Hitler the Standard Bearer
Himmler declared that the S.S. was a holy order, who, like Teutonic Knights
of Old, were on a Holy Mission to ennoble humanity by making the Aryan
race pure and supreme everywhere.
Both Hitler and Himmler even had portraits of themselves painted,
showing them as knights dressed in shining suits of armor.
They bandied about words like
"honor", "nobility", "spirituality",
and "purity", which may strike us as unbelievably hypocritical
today, but they believed them at the time.
Dr. Seuss ridiculed portraits of Adolf Hitler as a knight in shining armor,
Dec. 23, 1941.
(Yes, it's really the same Dr. Seuss, the one who is famous for the
children's stories like The Cat in the Hat
and How the Grinch Stole Christmas.
A little-known piece of historical trivia about Dr. Seuss
is that he was a political cartoonist before and during World War II.)
Examples of Hitler's 'odd beliefs or magical thinking' abound in
his 'table talk', the turgid monologues which he inflicted each
night on his bored and exhausted entourage. Thus he believed he could
read other people's thoughts and exert magical control over them
and that he had a sixth sense that protected him from danger.
For example, having made a speech at the Party Beer-Cellar in
Munich just before the outbreak of the Second World War, something
suddenly prompted him to leave, instead of staying on to chat with
the Party faithful as was his custom. Within minutes of his departure
a bomb exploded, killing eight of the old comrades and injuring
scores of others. He seems to have experienced no such premonition
in March 1943 when a bomb was placed on the plane in which he flew
back to Berlin from the Eastern front, but the bomb failed to detonate.
A further attempt to assassinate him at an exhibition a few days
later also failed because, once again, he decided on impulse to leave
early. 'Who says I am not under the special protection of God?'
he exclaimed. An example of his magical thinking is his frequently
repeated declaration that he and Germany were mystically merged:
'I know that everything that you are, you are through me, and
everything that I am, I am through you alone!'
Of the 'unusual perceptual experiences' reported by Hitler, he
acknowledged that he heard voices like those which inspired Joan
of Arc: they told him to rescue the Fatherland from the Jews.
He also claimed that he had a vision of Wotan, the old German
war god, pointing to the East above the heads of the cheering
Viennese crowds at the time of Austrian Anschluss.
Prophets, Cults, and Madness Anthony Stevens
and John Price, pages 97-98.
"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with
the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against
the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."
Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler, Ralph Mannheim, ed., New York: Mariner Books, 1999, page 65.
Likewise, David Pryce-Jones reported that "Hitler believed that he had been sent by
Joseph Goebbels, Adolf Hitler's fawning Minister of Propaganda, agreed:
Destiny has sent us this man [Adolf Hitler] so that we, in this time of great
external and internal stress, shall testify to the miracle.
The Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich, William L. Shirer, page 1109.
So who is "Destiny", and how can I meet her? Is she the sister of that other popular cause
of momentous events, "Fate"?
Likewise, when he heard that President Roosevelt had died, another one of Adolf Hitler's
superstitious sycophants declared in an enthusiastic outburst of muddle-minded mysticism:
This was the Angel of History! We felt its wings flutter through the room.
Was that not the turn of fortune we awaited so anxiously?
== Count Schwerin von Krosigk
The Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich, William L. Shirer, page 1110.
Horoscope of the Nazi Party
See: Erik Jan Hanussen; Hitler's Jewish Clairvoyant, Mel Gordon,
Richard Noll, in his biography of Carl G. Jung, wrote about the paganism that was popular
in Germany in the early twentieth century:
The youth organization of the Monistenbund — inspired and led by Haeckel
himself — sponsored sun-worshiping festivals each summer solstice. ...
Others wanted a Wagnerian twist to their Volkish neopaganism. They
gathered in bearskins and made ritual sacrifices of animals to Wotan, Thor,
Baldur, and other Teutonic deities. They studied the symbols of the ancient
Norse runes and took visionary journeys to meet with members of the ancient
spiritual brotherhood. There were dozens of groups like these, large and small.
They convinced themselves that they were chosen, like the grail knights in Wagner's
Parsifal, to seek and protect the Holy Grail — in this case, the spiritual
purity of Aryan Blood. The most famous of these was the Tannenberg Foundation of
General Erich Ludendorff, war hero and, later, a coconspirator in Adolf Hitler's
failed putsch in 1923. The symbol of Ludendorff's organization was the hammer
of Thor. Like many in German culture at the turn of the century, Ludendorff wanted
to eradicate Christianity and replace it with an Aryan faith. As one commentator
on the neopagan movement in Germany revealed, "In line with the Tannenberg
program for the restoration of the ancient Germanic religion, General Ludendorff,
accompanied by a few young men, would from time to time retire to the forests
near Munich, where a bonfire was lighted and a horse sacrificed in honor of Thor,
the god of Thunder."46
46. Paul Bramwell Means, Things That Are Caesar's: The Genesis of the
German Church Conflict (New York: Round Table Press, 1935), 166.
The Aryan Christ: The Secret Life of Carl Jung,
Richard Noll, pages 116 and 305 (footnote).
Many other books verify what Diener was saying about 'Putzi' Hanfstaengl.
The most detailed is the book written by
Ernst "Putzi" Hanfstaengl himself, called Unheard Witness, which
tells the story of Putzi's experiences with Adolf
Hitler. They met in Berlin, November 22, 1922, when Hitler gave a speech at
the Kindle Keller beer hall:
"Herr Hitler, my name is Hanfstaengl," I said. "Captain
Truman-Smith asked me to give you his best wishes."
"Ah yes, the big American," he answered.
"He begged me to come and listen to you and I can only say
I have been most impressed," I went on. "I agree with
ninety-five per cent of what you said and would very much like to
talk to you about the rest some time."
"Why yes, of course," Hitler said. "I am sure we shall
not have to quarrel about the odd five percent." He made a very
pleasant impression, modest and friendly. So we shook hands again and
I went home.
That night I could not go to sleep for a long time. My mind still
raced with the impressions of the evening. Where all our conservative
politicians and speakers were failing miserably to establish any
contact with the ordinary people, this self-made man, Hitler, was
clearly succeeding in presenting a non-Communist program
to exactly those people whose support we need.
On the other hand, I had not liked the look of those immediate
supporters I had seen. Rosenberg and the people around him seemed
to me distinctly dubious types. Then an aphorism of Nietsche floated
into my mind and provided consolation: "The first followers of
a movement do not prove anything against it."
Unheard Witness, Ernst "Putzi"
Hanfstaengl, 1957, pages 37-38.
And the upper-class Hanfstaengl family did try to polish the uncouth bumpkin Hitler:
"I felt quite embarrassed in my blue suit," Hitler told me.
"The servants were all in livery and we drank nothing but champagne
before the meal. And you should have seen the bathroom, you can even
regulate the heat of the water."
Unheard Witness, Ernst "Putzi"
Hanfstaengl, 1957, page 44.
And Putzi was so involved with all of the early Nazi party members
and their doings that he was really lucky that he wasn't put into
Landsberg prison with the rest of them after the failed Beer Hall
Putsch, for being a co-conspirator. The whole gang half lived at
(After the failed putsch attempt, Putzi, Goering, and other prominent Nazis fled to Austria and hid out
there until things cooled
And Putzi even confessed that he was guilty of taking
Harvard football fight songs and German folk
songs, and blending them together to make marching music for the Nazis.
Harvard was Putzi's alma mater; little did Harvard realize where their
American football education of the German aristocrat Ernst Hanfstaengl
It was on another occasion, at the house of Heinrich Hoffman, his
photographer friend, that I started playing some of the football
marches I had picked up at Harvard. I explained to Hitler all the
business about the cheer leaders and college songs and the
deliberate whipping up of hysterical enthusiasm. I told him about
the thousands of spectators being made to roar, "Harvard,
Harvard, Harvard, rah, rah, rah!" in unison and of the
hypnotic effect of this sort of thing. I played him some of the
Sousa marches and then my own "Falarah," to show how it
could be done by adapting German tunes, and gave them all that
bouyant beat so characteristic of American brass-band music. I
had Hitler fairly shouting with enthusiasm. "That is it,
Hanfstaengl, that is what we need for the movement, marvelous,"
and he pranced up and down the room like a drum majorette.
After that he had the S.A. band practising the same thing.
I even wrote a dozen marches or so myself over the course of the
years, including the one that was played by the brownshirt columns
as they marched through the Brandenburger Tor on the day Hitler
took over power. "Rah, rah, rah!" became "Sieg Heil,
Sieg Heil!" — that is the origin of it and I suppose I must
take my share of the blame.
Unheard Witness, Ernst "Putzi"
Hanfstaengl, 1957, pages 52-53.
(Actually, Putzi, I think it was, "Har-vard! Har-vard!" becomes
"Sieg-Heil! Sieg-Heil!", and "Rah, rah, rah!" becomes
"Heil Hit-ler!". You have to get the beat right. :-) But I digress.)
Diana Guiness (nee Diana Mitford, later Lady Diana Mosley) and Putzi Hanfstaengl,
at the 1934 Nuremberg Nazi Party Day Rally.
The Bavarian aristocrat and Harvard alumnus Putzi Hanfstaengl was a very early supporter
of Adolf Hitler. Putzi was bi-lingual and fluent in English because
his mother was an American
(as well as one of Frank Buchman's early Oxford Group members),
and his father was a Bavarian aristocrat, so Hitler put Putzi in charge of
foreign press relations. Putzi began inviting two of the Mitford sisters, Unity Mitford
and Diana Guiness (later Mosley), to the Nuremberg Nazi Party Day rallies in 1933.
But Putzi didn't like their style. Putzi described in his memoirs how,
at this 1934 rally, he had to use his handkerchief to wipe off
the extravagant make-up that the Mitford sisters wore, to bring them in line
with "Nordic womanhood", so that Hitler's sensibilities would not be
(Lady Diana commented in her autobiography that she didn't know why she looked
so pasty-faced in this photograph. Perhaps Putzi had really messed up her make-up.)
Hitler laughed when Unity later told him about that. He didn't seem to be offended
by anything that Unity did. He found her antics amusing.
Then Unity got her revenge on Putzi: She complained to Hitler that Putzi was such a stuffed
shirt and such a bore that they should play a joke on him. Hitler agreed.
They made Putzi believe that he was being exiled to the Spanish Civil War, and then
they shoved Putzi into an airplane, which took off.
The airplane only flew as far as Munich before landing and letting Putzi
out, but the prank totally unnerved Putzi, who complained that they were
conspiring to kill him, and he fled in a panic to Switzerland, never to return to Nazi
Unity actually did Putzi an immense favor there, quite accidentally.
By running when he did, Putzi entirely avoided
both World War II and complicity in the Nazi war crimes.
And he also avoided an untimely demise at the hands of the other Nazi leaders.
There really was a plot, among Hitler's inner circle, to get rid of Putzi.
Putzi was Jewish, and he was in direct competition with Dr. Joseph Goebbels, the Minister
of Propaganda. And the SS and Gestapo leader Heinrich Himmler didn't like Putzi either.
(Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean that they aren't all out to get you.)
During the war, Putzi lived moderately comfortably in England, even though he was
interned for a while because of his German citizenship and Nazi past. Then the Americans
requisitioned him, and he ended up living in
the USA, in Washington DC, where he worked as an advisor to President
Roosevelt, as an expert on Hitler's personality.
After the war, Putzi retired in Germany, the only unscathed survivor of
Hitler's early inner circle.
Ken Ragge commented on Diener's letter:
Paul Diener wrote:
> Ragge is wrong when he says Buchman's fondness for Hitler should not be stressed.
What I wrote was:
> Actually, to mention Buchman's fondness for Hitler is a bit off
base — _any_ totalitarian leader was held in high regard by him
and his organization.
Leaving the inherent sarcasm of my statement aside, can you name _one_
non-Communist despot in power between the 1930's and Buchman's death in
the 60s that Buchman _didn't_ support? Was every non-Communist despot
Ken Ragge, in a letter to the mailing list ADDICT-L@LISTSERV.KENT.EDU,
Jan 29, 2002.
Paul Diener answered:
No, not every despot is a fascist. The fascist political tradition is a
special and unique historical phenomenon. The word 'fascism' is best used
with care, as scholars who are experts in fascist studies use it.
Your statement seemed to imply that the Hitler-Buchman connection need not
be stressed and investigated. If this is your opinion, I differ. I think
it is worth keeping this connection in mind, and investigating it.
As to Buchman's support for all 'despots', I think you underestimate
Buchman and his movement. The Buchmanites strongly attacked 'capitalism',
and demanded that big business be reformed. They vilified business leaders
who acted as 'despots'. Buchman also thought labor union 'bosses' were
despots, who manipulated the working man. Both business and union despots,
Buchman repeatedly insisted, needed to 'change'. This could happen if both
accepted the spiritual counselling of a God-controlled figure, such as
Buchman himself. Buchman also saw the hand of God as working in the New
Germany, as you know. Like Buchman, the Nazis were violently opposed to
despotic, exploitative 'capitalists'.
'Not individual greed, but common need' was the OG cry. (This was also
the cry in other fascist movements, and the Nazi Party adopted this as its
official motto). Buchman was opposed to despots who pursued 'individual
greed'. Buchman was a protofascist, not an old-style advocate of rapacious
dictators. Niebuhr and Orwell saw this clearly.
All fascist movements had, and have, a very real
reformist / revolutionary aspect. This accounts, in large part, for their
ability to attract followers. Fascisms promise some real reforms, and, in a
period of severe crisis, many middle-class persons of liberal persuasion
come to believe that ONLY fascist methods can achieve these needed reforms,
while still preserving their own class status.
Just as you misportray and misunderstand AA, so you misportray and
misunderstand the Oxford Groups. NEITHER of these movements is just an
oppressive regime, 'brainwashing' and bilking the innocent. Both movements
point to very real problems in society, and both offer solutions plausible
to many. In both movements, long-term affiliation is voluntary, though
exposure and early indoctrination is often coerced. Most important, neither
of these movements is unique. The Oxford Groups was only one of MANY
protofascist movements in the U.S. in the 1930s, and AA is only one of many
such movements today.
Paul Diener (pauldiener@PRODIGY.NET), in a letter to the mailing list ADDICT-L@LISTSERV.KENT.EDU,
Feb 02, 2002.
Also see the description of the characteristics of fascism in a letter,
Regarding Hitler and the Nazis,
Frank Buchman was basically so "politically naïve" (as sympathetic historians
have called it)
that he thought that an ideal world
government would consist of a bunch of Christian Fascist dictators
running all of the countries of the world (and, presumably, forcing
Buchmanism on all of the people of the world).
God would give the orders to the dictators, and then the dictators
would give the orders to the people. Hence, we would have one world
under God-control, simply, easily, overnight, and Frank Buchman
would be up there at the top, hanging out with the dictators,
and giving them advice and "Guidance".
Buchman said of his Oxford Group:
Its aim is a new social order under the dictatorship of the spirit of God...
Inside Buchmanism; an independent inquiry into the
Oxford Group Movement and Moral Re-Armament,
Geoffrey Williamson, Philosophical Library, New York, c1954, page 147.
So Frank Buchman continued to visit Berlin and associate with the
highest-ranking Nazis, imagining
that they would soon be on their knees, begging God to fix their
moral shortcomings and defects of character...
Frank Buchman never recanted, or took back any of what he
said, or even hinted that it was
a mistake. He believed that he had spoken and acted under the
Guidance of God, and that Guidance was infallible, so there was no way
that he could or would take it back or amend
Of course not. In fact, fascism is not an undesired state of affairs
to Buchmanism; it is, rather, the logical goal of Buchmanism.
Two weeks after Buchman's Hitler-praising interview was published
in the New York World Telegram newspaper,
The Christian Century magazine printed this criticism of
Frank Buchman's remarks:
...Thus as plainly as it could be done Frank Buchman points to
fascism as the way out of our social difficulties.
Indeed the worst thing about a religion which undertakes to be
purely individualistic and to concern itself not at all as to the
way in which the corporate life of society is organized is that
it cannot succeed in that undertaking — it is forced to take a
political position, and its utter lack of understanding of
political realities predetermines what that position shall be.
Such a religion enters the social arena inevitably on the side of
reaction. God works through individuals it [Buchmanism] argues.
The way to make institutions good is to make the individuals
who run them good. The fewer these individuals are, the simpler
the operation. The only way to make a good government is to
convert the governors, and if there could be but one governor
dictating the policies of the nation under God's guidance, the
ideal type of state would have been achieved. Individualism in
religion thus leads by the straightest of roads to fascism in
It is not a question any more — if it ever was — of individual
religion versus the social gospel; it is a question of what social
gospel. Shall religion commit itself to a social ideal and program
based upon the naive assumptions of individualism or based upon
an intelligent understanding of the realities of man's collective
life? Shall it preach a social gospel of reaction or of construction?
No other alternative is in the long run possible.
The Oxford group movement is only following the logic of
its position when it declares for reaction.
Any dream of a "God-guided dictator" involves
the reality of waking to the cry, "Thank heaven for Hitler!"
A God-Guided Dictator, The Christian Century,
53:1182-3, Sept. 9, 1936, pages 1182-1183.
The Foreign Minister of the Netherlands speaks at the League of Nations.
Frank Buchman is 2nd from right.
Notice how everyone else in the room was silently,
respectfully listening to the speaker who had the floor. Everyone but Frank Buchman,
that is. Frank was rudely speaking out of turn, expressing his own opinions to the
fellow on the far right, who appears to be trying hard to listen to the Foreign Minister.
"Unless the subject of the conversation is how great they are, Narcissistic vampires
will become visibly bored. One of the main reasons Narcissists wear expensive
watches is so they can look at them when someone else is talking."
Emotional Vampires: Dealing with People Who Drain You Dry,
Albert J. Bernstein, Ph.D., page 136.
Reinhold Niebuhr, the eminent theologian who authored The Serenity Prayer
which is so popular in 12-Step circles,
also criticized Frank Buchman's remarks, stating
in The Christian Century magazine a month later:
On returning from Europe, Frank Buchman, Oxford group revivalist,
is quoted by a reputable New York paper as having said: "I
thank heaven for a man like Adolf Hitler, who built a front-line
defense against the anti-Christ of communism...."
In this interview the social philosophy of the Oxford group, long
implicit in its strategy, is made explicit, and revealed in all its
childishness and viciousness. This philosophy has been implicit in
Buchmanite strategy from the beginning. It explains the particular
attention which is paid by Mr. Buchman and his followers to big men,
leaders, in industry and politics. The idea is that if the man of power
can be converted, God will be able to control a larger area
of human life through his power than if a little man
were converted. This is the logic which has filled the
Buchmanites with touching solicitude for the souls
of such men as Henry Ford or Harvey Firestone and
prompted them to whisper confidentially from time
to time that these men were on the very threshold
of the kingdom of God. It is this strategy which
prompts or justifies the first-class travel of all the
Oxford teams. They hope to make contact with big
men in the luxurious first-class quarters of ocean
In other words, a nazi social philosophy has been a covert presupposition
of the whole Oxford Group enterprise from the very beginning.
We may be
grateful to the leader for revealing so clearly what has been slightly
hidden. Now we can see how unbelievably naive this movement is in its efforts
to save the world. If it would
content itself with preaching repentance to drunkards and adulterers
one might be willing to respect it as a religious revival
method which knows how to confront the sinner
with God. But when it runs to Geneva, the seat of the League of Nations,
or to Cleveland to the republican national convention,
or to Prince Starhemberg or Hitler, or to any seat of power,
always with the idea that it is on
the verge of saving the world by bringing the people who control
the world under God-control,
it is difficult to restrain the contempt one feels for this dangerous
This idea of world salvation
implies a social philosophy which is completely innocent of
any understanding of the social dynamics of a civilization.
Does Mr. Buchman really believe that the dictators of the modern
world create their dictatorships out of whole cloth?
He does not know, evidently, that they are the creatures more
than the creators of vast social movements in modern history.
The particular social forces which create dictatorships
are on the whole the decadent forces of a very sick society.
Hitler and Buchman, Reinhold Niebuhr, The Christian Century,
53:1315-6, Oct. 7, 1936, page 1315.
Courage to Change, An Introduction to the Life and Thought of
Reinhold Niebuhr, June Bingham, page 202.
Indeed. Frank Buchman's ideas of how society works, and of how society
ought to work,
were quite different from most Americans' politics.
In an ideal Buchmanite "God-controlled" country, you would
not want democracy, a constitution, a congress, or a bill of rights.
Those things are just problems to Buchmanism, because they prevent
the most efficient and simple implementation of "God's Will".
To a Buchmanite, democracy is just the collective opinion of a bunch of
"insane" sinners who are not listening to the voice of God.
Who would want such fools interfering with the work of a God-guided man?
Imagine if the President of the United States came under
Congress and the Supreme Court might block his orders whenever
those orders seriously conflicted with the Constitution or the Bill
His success in enforcing "the Will of God" would depend
on the prevailing political climate — upon which politicians won
the last elections, and which political hacks had been appointed
to the Supreme Court.
There would always be a small chance that Congress or the Supreme
Court might actually rise up out of the cesspool of partisan politics
and really try to uphold,
preserve and defend the Constitution of the United States, just like
their oaths of office say. (Admittedly, not very likely, but it might happen.)
They might not help the President to
carry out "the Will of God", as he hears God dictating it to him.
In order to get the whole country completely, unquestionably, under
"God-control", it would also be necessary to "change" a
majority of the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the
Supreme Court, and get them all under God-control too.
But just about the time that we have accomplished all of that, more
elections will be held, and then we will have to "change" a
whole new crop of politicians, yet again.
And then we would need to go do the same things with all 50 of the
state governments, again and again...
Things would be so much simpler if we just had one strong
dictator who was under God-control, like a Jesus-loving
Adolf Hitler, ruling the entire country with absolute authority,
making everybody do "The Right Thing" all of the time...
Get Everyone Under God-control
Remember that Frank Buchman said, while he was thanking Heaven for giving us a man like Adolf Hitler,
... Human problems aren't economic. They're
moral and they can't be solved by immoral measures.
They could be solved within a God-controlled
democracy, or perhaps I should say a theocracy, and
they could be solved through a God-controlled Fascist
Hitler and Buchman, Reinhold Niebuhr, The Christian Century,
53:1315-6, Oct. 7, 1936, page 1315.
A God-Guided Dictator, The Christian Century,
53:1182-3, Sept. 9, 1936, page 1183.
The Mystery of Moral Re-Armament; A Study of
Frank Buchman and His Movement, Tom Driberg, 1965, pages 68-69.
That was basically what Frank Buchman's simplistic political thinking
Note that much of Frank Buchman's fascist philosophy rubbed off on
his follower, William G. Wilson, who later criticized people by writing:
How persistently we claim the right to decide all by ourselves
just what we shall think and just how we shall act. ...
William G. Wilson
We are certain that our intelligence, backed by willpower,
can rightly control our inner lives and guarantee us success in
the world we live in. This brave philosophy, wherein each man
plays God, sounds good in the speaking, but it still has to
meet this acid test: how well does it actually work?
One good look in the mirror ought to be answer enough for any alcoholic.
... The philosophy of self-sufficiency is not paying off. Plainly enough,
it is a bone-crushing juggernaut whose final achievement is ruin.
Therefore, we who are alcoholics can consider ourselves fortunate indeed.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, pages 36-37.
According to Bill Wilson, you don't even have the right to decide all
by yourself just what you will think.
Thinking for yourself and taking care of yourself by using your own
intelligence and will power
is "playing God".
All of your actions are supposed to be dictated by God, Bill said,
so acting and thinking independently is usurping God's authority.
Acting independently, doing what you wish or doing what you think
is right, is going against "the Will of God".
You are "fortunate", Bill said, if alcohol destroys your ability to
think for yourself and take care of yourself.
Then you will have no choice but to just mindlessly obey the orders
of your sponsor, and let him do your thinking for you.
Thus, the ideal A.A. member is a mindless robot that automatically obeys orders.
Bill Wilson also admired dictatorships, and after World War Two, bemoaned
the fact that they had gone out of fashion:
In A.A. there is active still another form of association, a form of which
the world is today in great doubt. It has its virtues, nevertheless,
especially for us of Alcoholics Anonymous: I am speaking of dictatorship.
In A.A. we have two dictators, and we profit and grow through both.
One is John Barleycorn, who is never very far from the elbow of each of us.
The other is the Father of Lights, who presides over all men.
God is saying to us, "Learn my will and do it." And John Barleycorn is saying
to each of us, "You had better do God's will or I will kill you!"
Alcoholics Anonymous Comes Of Age
William G. Wilson (1957), page 225.
This line is troubling:
"The other [dictator] is the Father of Lights, who presides over all men."
The Angel of Light is Lucifer. From what I have heard, I would guess that
he is not a dictator whom you would want running your life.
Jesus told us to have love in our hearts, not shiny lights in our eyes.
Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Joseph Stalin had really given
dictatorships a bad name before and during World War Two,
but that didn't stop Bill Wilson from still admiring dictatorships as
a form of government (just as long as he got
to be the dictator). Other people may have had great doubts about the
virtues of dictatorships, but not Bill Wilson. He was keeping the faith,
and making sure that people could continue to "profit and grow"
through dictatorships in Alcoholics Anonymous.
"Follow the dictates of a Higher Power and you will presently
live in a new and wonderful world..."
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson,
Working With Others, page 100.
Therefore we [AA] have the full benefits of the murderous political dictatorships of
today but none of their liabilities.
Alcoholics Anonymous Comes Of Age,
William G. Wilson, pages 105—106.
What benefits, and what liabilites?
And how does Alcoholics Anonymous not have those liabilities?
What magical technology gives A.A. the same "benefits" as any murderous dictatorship,
but without the liabilities of murderous dictatorships?
Bill Wilson's secretary Nell Wing reported much the same thing —
that Bill Wilson declared in a 1956 letter to Father J. J. Hennessey, S.J., that
the General Service Conference and the Board of Trustees
were run on democratic principles, with the leadership obeying
the rank and file membership, but, Bill then wrote:
"Then, too we have a dictatorship — and how! God constantly says to us,
'I trust you will find and do my will.' John Barleycorn, always at our
elbow, says, 'If you don't conform, I'll kill you or drive you mad.'
So we have all the advantages and more, of the modern dictatorship."
Bill Wilson, quoted by his secretary in Grateful To Have Been There,
Nell Wing, page 22.
For Bill Wilson to be boasting of "all of the advantages
of the modern dictatorship" so soon after World War II was insane.
- Joseph Stalin had murdered 35 million Russians with his reign of terror
and his purges, gulags in Siberia, and relocation and forced starvation of
millions of small farmers (in order to get their farms).
- Benito Mussolini slaughtered an unknown large number of Ethiopians.
- Then Adolf Hitler managed to get another 40 or 50 million people killed in WW II.
- And then Bill Wilson came along and stupidly babbled about "all of
the advantages of the modern dictatorship."
Plus, we have to ask,
"What advantages?", and
"Advantages to whom?"
In most dictatorships, the dictator and his small inner circle of henchmen and
cronies are the only people who enjoy the advantages of the dictatorship,
while the vast masses of common people suffer immensely.
- Bill Wilson could only have meant that
those alcoholics were so bad
that they needed a Big Boss to control them and make them be good.
- Bill Wilson just assumed that he deserved to be the dictator
and High Priest of Alcoholics Anonyous —
as the Big Book co-author Henry Parkhurst described it,
"The Grand Poohbah of Alcoholics Anonymous".
What made Bill qualified to be the dictator and High Priest?
Why was it such a 'great advantage' for Bill to be able to
order everybody else around,
and dictate the terms of their recovery, and
even their religious beliefs?
Yes, that is Bill's narcissistic delusions of grandeur, showing again.
Either that, or it's the clever con-man Bill Wilson, playing his mind
games on his victims again. I'll let you decide which it is.
In addition, the Bill Wilson often expressed
great contempt for his fellow alcoholics —
he declared that they were "defective" and
"didn't want to get too good too
soon" because they did not like the authoritarian nature of the Oxford Groups:
...drinkers would not ... stand for the rather aggressive evangelism of the Oxford Group. ...
It was too authoritarian for them. In other respects, too, we
found we had to make haste slowly.
When first contacted, most alcoholics just wanted to find sobriety,
nothing else. They clung to their other defects, letting go only
little by little. They simply did not want to get "too good
Alcoholics Anonymous Comes Of Age,
William G. Wilson, pages 74-75.
So, those alcoholics were "defective" because they only wanted
to "find sobriety", and they didn't want to join an authoritarian
Bill even said that alcoholics were so bad that they must be
tortured into doing the right thing:
Why all this insistence that every A.A. member must hit bottom first?
The answer is that few people will sincerely try to practice the A.A.
program unless they have hit bottom. For practicing A.A.'s remaining
eleven Steps means the adoption of attitudes and actions that almost
no alcoholic who is still drinking can dream of taking. Who wishes to
be rigorously honest and tolerant?
Who wants to confess his faults to another and make restitution for
harm done? Who cares anything about a Higher Power, let alone
meditation and prayer? Who wants to sacrifice time and energy in
trying to carry A.A.'s message to the next sufferer? No, the average
alcoholic, self-centered in the extreme, doesn't care for this
prospect — unless he has to do these things in order to stay
Under the lash of alcoholism, we are driven to A.A., and there
we discover the fatal nature of our situation.
Then, and only then, do we become as open-minded to conviction and
as willing to listen as the dying can be.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 24.
(Yes, the conviction that Bill mentioned there is Frank Buchman's
conviction, where you convict yourself
of all kinds of sins.)
And Bill Wilson wrote that
[A.A. members are] impersonally and severely disciplined
(A personal letter from Bill Wilson to Dr. Harry Tiebout,
9 Nov 1950, quoted in Not-God: A History of Alcoholics Anonymous, Ernest Kurtz, page 129.)
We saw we needn't always be bludgeoned and beaten into humility.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, William G. Wilson, page 75.
(Not always? Just sometimes?)
By the way, notice the use of the "Preacher's We" there.
Bill Wilson did not believe that he needed to get beaten into submission
or whipped with "the lash of alcoholism" to make him more religious —
he thought that the other A.A. members needed it so that they would become
as "spiritual" as he was.
Next: The War Years: On the Road Again
Previous: Sam Shoemaker Quits
Click Fruit for Menu
Last updated 27 April 2019.
The most recent version of this file can be found at