I submit that there is only one real being in the universe, and his name is Conan the Barbarian. None of us exist at all. This world is nothing but an illusion, and we are figments of His (Conan's) imagination. I have no evidence to back this up, but I have crossed far over the Bridge of Reason to the desired Shore of Faith. Also, Conan wants us all to drink and drug as much as possible, since none of it matters anyway because we don't exist in the first place. Tell me, steppers, who are you to say this is not true?
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation." - Herbert Spencer- Alcoholics Anonymous, 4th Edition, Appendice II, Spiritual Experience, pg. 568
Comments
becket
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:03
Permalink
I can't say it's not true.
I can't say it's not true. If that's what you believe after having "crossed far over the Bridge of Reason to the desired Shore of Faith" and this is the best you can do, then dig it till you take your last breath.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:06
Permalink
The best I can do
How could I do better?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
Vicky345uk
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:10
Permalink
Bucket 's a knob penny, he is
Bucket 's a knob penny, he is nasty vile creature....
Vicky345uk
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:06
Permalink
Your a hairy man who has
Your a hairy man who has moles all over his horrible face.... Going stroke your cat.....
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:09
Permalink
Becket, do you believe
Becket, do you believe science should be taught in school?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
becket
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:13
Permalink
"How could I do better?"
"How could I do better?" Stop living in the hypothetical.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:15
Permalink
What makes the hypothetical
What makes the hypothetical inferior?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:17
Permalink
Indeed, what makes "the
Indeed, what makes "the hypothetical" hypothetical?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
becket
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:25
Permalink
The hypothetical is neither
The hypothetical is neither inferior nor hypothetical compared to what you have set out to create for yourself, not until the novelty and usefulness wear off. But what you have described in your opening gambit just bores me, that's all. In my opinion it is inferior to what I would construct for myself if I had the ability. If this is what you want, you should have it. But for purposes of discussion, it's just another forum rabbit hole and time toilet.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:28
Permalink
To you, maybe. I take it you
To you, maybe. I take it you don't want to talk about this? Perhaps you think I am wasting your time? Would you rather discuss Danny?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
becket
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:17
Permalink
Should science be taught in
Should science be taught in school? Whose science? The science of the logical? The science of the religious? The science of the dreamer? The science of the atheist? Science is a fairly wide category. Can you be specific? Instead of trying to pull a Rope-A-Dope, just ask the question you mean to ask. I'll answer it as best I can.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:26
Permalink
Ok, something uncontraversial
Ok, something uncontraversial. Should we teach kids that fish breathe through gills and mammals breathe through lungs? Would it be acceptable to teach kids that humans are born with gills to breathe underwater?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
Vicky345uk
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:20
Permalink
Science is taught in schools
Science is taught in schools penny.
becket
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 16:26
Permalink
Pretty sure Pennywise knows
Pretty sure Pennywise knows that. His question is, should it be taught in schools?
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
gigi
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 18:36
Permalink
Of course science should be
Of course science should be taught in schools. As should the arts, fairy tales, folklore and fables. We all need facts and fantasy in equal measure. And we need to learn to differentiate between the two as best we can, take lessons and ideas from both sides, nurture our curiosity and form our own opinions.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 18:41
Permalink
Gigi, what would you say it
Gigi, what would you say it is that differentiates science from the arts?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
gigi
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 18:51
Permalink
It's funny, Penny, that seems
It's funny, Penny, that seems like it should be such an easy question to answer. I could say that science is based in fact, is proveable and exact while the arts are subjective, fantastical and fluid. But the truth is, I think there's a great deal of overlap. I'm not sure how to answer that to my own satisfaction at the moment.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 18:53
Permalink
I like that reply.
I like that reply.
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
gigi
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 18:55
Permalink
And your opinion on your
And your opinion on your question, Penny?
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:05
Permalink
I don't know. I suppose we
I don't know. I suppose we could start by asking what each study refers to. If we say the ocean is composed of water, what type of claim are we making about the world? If we say the ocean is beautiful, are we making a different sort of claim?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:00
Permalink
If there were no conscious
If there were no conscious mind in the universe, would the ocean still be made of water? If there were no conscious mind in the universe, would the ocean still be beautiful?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
gigi
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:11
Permalink
If there were no conscious
If there were no conscious mind in the universe, the ocean would still be made of water. It would still be beautiful, as well. There would be no word for it or knowledge of its beauty, however.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:16
Permalink
How could it be beautiful, do
How could it be beautiful, do you think? Is beauty something more than a type of value judgement? If not, how could the ocean have the value of being beautiful in the absence of any being capable of assigning such value?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:22
Permalink
Remember, if you insert your
Remember, if you insert your own aesthetic judgements about the ocean, you are adding a conscious mind to the analysis.
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:29
Permalink
Let me ask you this:
Let me ask you this:
Say you are looking at a beautiful painting. Does the beauty originate on the canvase, or does it originate in your own mind?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
gigi
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:44
Permalink
The beauty of a painting
The beauty of a painting originates in my mind
A painting is only beautiful or ugly or mediocre if there is a conscious mind making the judgement
The ocean is beautiful regardless of the presence of a mind making a value judgement
It is beautiful because of the power it wields and the life it sustains within its depths. The beauty of the ocean remains the same whether or not anyone is there to judge it.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 20:03
Permalink
So, to you, the ocean is
So, to you, the ocean is beautiful regardless of whether anyone exits to perceive it. I assume you would say the same thing about a forest. Now, let's say there are exactly three people in the world. One person says the forest is more beautiful than the ocean, another says the opposite, and the third says they are equally beautiful. If the forest and the ocean, because of their power and the life they sustain, have independent (objective) beauty, then presumably there would be a way to figure out which of our three friends is correct. I mean, if both the forest and the ocean are OBJECTIVLY beautiful, then we should be able to OBJECTIVLY determine whether one is more beautiful than the other, right? If so, how could we do this?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
gigi
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 20:32
Permalink
They are all wrong in that
They are all wrong in that they seem to believe that they are in the position to judge in the first place. They are also wrong in assuming that they must prove themselves right in their belief. It doesn't matter if one is more beautiful than the other or if they are equal in their beauty. They can go on arguing and none of it will matter. Trying to prove that a is better than b or a and b are equal will just start a war or fuck up an internet forum.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
LisaMarie
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:33
Permalink
Henri Bergson
http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2012/08/07/henri-bergson-on-intui...
Listen to the purity of the message in here. It is so pertinent for us in these times. Listen to your inner self. Push away the stuff piled upon you which is false.
becket
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 22:19
Permalink
Saw this on Facebook today.
Saw this on Facebook today. Too close for coincidence. I'm guessing you have an account there. And if I'm wrong, just lead me into the beautiful/not beautiful ocean, in over my head until drowned.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Pennywise
Tue, 08/21/2012 - 03:32
Permalink
I don't go on Facebook, and
I don't go on Facebook, and just made this up as I went. Do you have a link, or would that be too private to share?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
becket
Tue, 08/21/2012 - 12:04
Permalink
I would post the piece but
I would post the piece but don't know how to add a picture my post here. It wouldn't be wise to post a link to any page on Facebook; if you want on, you need to join. Maybe I can send it to your email.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
live_free_or_die
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 18:45
Permalink
AA = fantasy + ouija boards + seances + dead monks
Of course, that is reality.
god does not perform daily miracles for people sitting in roomz across the globe saying the lord's prayer.
Why don't don't AA'ers use the higher power prayer?
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
gigi
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 18:53
Permalink
AA is neither science nor art
AA is neither science nor art. It is religion. Whole different ballgame.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
live_free_or_die
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 18:59
Permalink
AA and art
I think there is some form of art in religion
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
gigi
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:06
Permalink
Yes. The art in religion is
Yes. The art in religion is in the myths themselves. The problems start when people forget that religious stories are, in fact, just the art of stoytelling.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:18
Permalink
So is religion "good" art but
So is religion "good" art but "poor" science?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
live_free_or_die
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:31
Permalink
For some, good art,
others, not so much
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
gigi
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:47
Permalink
Neither. Religion is the
Neither. Religion is the rejection of art and the denial of science
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
becket
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 22:12
Permalink
Please explain how religion
Please explain how religion is "the rejection of art".
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
LisaMarie
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:31
Permalink
You are absolutely right Gigi, Bingo!!!
Religion, The Bible etc....were myths, fables, moral stories and attempts to explain the unexplainable. Who created mass, particles or dust....who....science can only go so far but can not explain the very last question, How Did This All Begin? Who or What created the Big Bang etc....
SandyB
Tue, 08/21/2012 - 01:18
Permalink
Hi Bingo
http://youtu.be/lz1qIj3_1U4
becket
Tue, 08/21/2012 - 12:01
Permalink
"Yes. The art in religion is
"Yes. The art in religion is in the myths themselves. The problems start when people forget that religious stories are, in fact, just the art of stoytelling."
If this is so, and the program of AA is considered a "religion", wouldn't it be the responsibility of each AA member to be mindful that the program is nothing but storytelling, allegory, with ample headroom to interpret according to one's own need or desire? In other words, why the rigidity in interpretation to the point of frustration and anger, when these are clearly myths (suggestions) to be incorporated as one sees fit and not as directed or demanded by some outside force?
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
becket
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 22:21
Permalink
"I think there is some form
"I think there is some form of art in religion"
You've made it abundantly clear that you only believe in the art of the con.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
live_free_or_die
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 22:42
Permalink
Correct judge.
Religion and its success comes in the selling and packaging of the product, whether it be catholicism or billywism.
The art of the con is exactly what I meant judge bucket. Thanks.
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
becket
Tue, 08/21/2012 - 12:01
Permalink
Lame attempt at a save. Do
Lame attempt at a save. Do not want.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:19
Permalink
Perhaps religion is art
Perhaps religion is art masquerading as science?
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
live_free_or_die
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:23
Permalink
There is no science in religion
Is that a serious question? Another leading question pennyW?
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
Pennywise
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:27
Permalink
Just shooting the breeze.
Just shooting the breeze. Nothing more.
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
LisaMarie
Mon, 08/20/2012 - 19:42
Permalink
You do understand God is a
You do understand God is a mythological warrior for the good. Like ZEUS. The bible made the name of God popular, before the Bible there was ZEUS and the mythological figures associated with him.
You really give religion more credit then it deserves. You definetly have missed the boat on the amount of AA people that buy into the religion you are speaking of.
Pages